Livestock Development in Armenia: South-North 2



Contract partner: SDA - Strategic Development Agency Country: Armenien Funding amount: € 2.000.000,00 Project start: 01.10.2021 End: 31.03.2025

Short Description:

Overall goal


Inclusive and sustainable agricultural growth of livestock-depending rural communities in Armenia through improved productivity and enhanced competitiveness of the private sector in the domestic and export markets.


Expected results


1. Livestock farmers/producers benefit from better functioning and reliable meat and milk markets

2. Livestock farmers/producers benefit from improved access to farm support services

3. Livestock farmers/producers benefit from effective fodder production and sustainable natural resource (grassland, pasture, water) management

4. Female farmers/employees/producers benefit from their involvement and role increase in the livestock sector


Target group / Beneficiaries


The project’s direct beneficiaries are 140 private and public actors involved in the implementation of rural development strategies and/or involved in milk and meat value chains: (a) slaughterhouses, milk and cattle consolidators/buyers, milk processors; (b) veterinarians, artificial insemination (AI) service providers, input suppliers for veterinary and AI services; representatives of local and regional authorities, working group members responsible for development and implementation of socio-economic programs in line with regional/marz programs and state policy; (d) Women-led dairy SMEs and “Lead” Farmers.

End Beneficiaries of the project are rural inhabitants of 70 rural settlements of Syunik, Gegharkunik, and Shirak marzes involved in milk and meat value chains as producer farmers, entrepreneurs or employees and their family members who will benefit in terms of enhanced income and employment. The total number of end beneficiaries is 18,400 livestock farmers/producers (33% female) from 7,200 farming households.


Activities


1.1: Improving livestock transportation and slaughter infrastructure (slaughterhouses, transportation, storage etc.) to establish a steady supply chain

1.2: Raising competitiveness and level of sophistication of existing and new milk processors increase sales of dairy and cheese in local and export markets and enhance demand for raw milk produced by farmers

1.3: Supporting consolidation efforts by smallholder suppliers to ease logistical challenges

2.1: Capacity building and developing private veterinary and AI services in rural settlements

2.2: Improving genetics of cattle stocks through animal replacement and AI services

3.1: Mobilizing and improving/upgrading capacities of local authorities, farmers/pasture users and fodder producers on effective fodder production, pasturelands usage, planning, and management

3.2: Strengthening capacities of direct beneficiaries in effective fodder production and sustainable pasture and water resource management

4.1: Supporting women-led SMEs and “lead farmer/s” to improve their businesses to increase sales of dairy and cheese, support consolidation efforts by smallholder suppliers, and enhance demand for raw milk produced by farmers

4.2: Strengthening capacities of female farmers/fodder producers on effective fodder production


Context


Armenia was the first among the former Soviet republics to implement mass privatization of agricultural lands (average farm size is 1.48 ha, only 1 ha is arable). Agriculture is one of the critical sectors of the country’s economy, which provides about 12% of the gross domestic product (GDP). About 317,000 farming enterprises provide 97% of the gross agricultural output. The sector accounts for 24.3% of the employed in the Republic of Armenia. Rural communities in Armenia face numerous problems: Lack of sustainable economic opportunities, high rates of unemployment and migration, low farm and rural non-farm incomes due to low productivity in agricultural activities. Poverty remains a severe problem in Armenia; it is estimated that one third of the rural population lives at or below the national poverty line.

Though livestock productivity has grown in recent years, yields are still a long way from potential. Livestock productivity could be increased with improved animal husbandry, feeding, and veterinary care. Although these issues are relevant for the whole country, the situation is worse in remote and border areas of Armenia: Syunik, Gegharkunik, and Shirak marzes are amongst the disadvantaged and underdeveloped marzes of Armenia due to the recent war in Nagorno Karabakh (and actually decreased land/pasture resources for use), remoteness from Yerevan, and partially tough climatic conditions which are not favorable for high-value crops.

project number 8289-00/2021
source of funding OEZA
sector Landwirtschaft
tied
modality Project-type interventions
marker Environment: 1, Desertification: 1, Gender: 1, Poverty: 2
  • Policy marker: are used to identify, assess and facilitate the monitoring of activities in support of policy objectives concerning gender equality, aid to environment, participatory development/good governance, trade development and reproductive, maternal, newborn and child health. Activities targeting the objectives of the Rio Conventions include the identification of biodiversity, climate change mitigation, climate change adaptation, and desertification.
    • 1= policy is a significant objective of the activity
    • 2= policy is the principal objective of the activity
  • Donor/ source of funding: The ADA is not only implementing projects and programmes of the Austrian Development Cooperation , but also projects funded from other sources and donors such as
    • AKF - Foreign Disaster Fund of the Austrian federal government
    • BMLFUW - Federal Ministry for Agriculture, Forestry, Environment and Water
    • EU - Funds of the European Commission
    • Others - various other donors are listed in ADA’s annual business report.
  • Type of Aid – Aid modalities: classifies transfers from the donor to the first recipient of funds such as budget support, core contributions and pooled programmes and funds to CSOs and multilateral organisations, project-type interventions, experts and other technical assistance, scholarships and student costs in donor countries, debt relief, administrative costs and other in-donor expenditures.
  • Purpose/ sector code: classifies the specific area of the recipient’s economic or social structure, funded by a bilateral contribution.
  • Tied/Untied: Untied aid is defined as loans and grants whose proceeds are fully and freely available to finance procurement from all OECD countries and substantially all developing countries. Transactions are considered tied unless the donor has, at the time of the aid offer, clearly specified a range of countries eligible for procurement which meets the tests for “untied” aid.