Support to JLOS - Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) Program



Contract partner: MFPED - Ministry of Finance, Planning and Economic Development - UgandaCountry: Uganda Funding amount: € 342.436,00Project start: 01.11.2013End: 31.10.2016

Short Description:

Overall goal


The Justice Law and Order Sector (JLOS) brings together 17 institutions with a common vision to promote rule of law in Uganda and to implement the third Strategic Investment Plan (SIP III) which is supported by the Austrian Development Cooperation (ADC).


The Constitution of the Republic of Uganda, national laws and SIP III recognize the role of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR). The formal legal system faces challenges of lengthy, protracted and complex legal procedures that alienate the majority of the population and result in a slow and laborious dispute resolution system. The focus especially in the civil justice system and land and family matters is towards diversion of disputes to ADR processes that can foster amicable settlement of disputes and reconciliation of the parties, in addition to reducing the lead time of determining cases, increasing productivity of judges and reducing costs of dispute resolution.


This program is intended to promote equal access to justice through the establishment of an effective and cost efficient ADR system. It will be implemented by a multi-institutional team, headed by the Judiciary with support from the JLOS Secretariat. Targeted institutions are the Judiciary, Ministry of Justice and Constitutional Affairs, Judicial Service Commission, Uganda Human Rights Commission and Uganda Law Society.


The project is expected to deliver the following results:

1. Clear and consistent rules and gender sensitive procedures for ADR established;

2. Increased access to ADR services (incl. training for 475 staff in the targeted institutions in skills required for the effective delivery of gender sensitive ADR services to create a pool of mediators and conciliators and enhance the ability of support staff in record keeping, data collection and customer service);

3. Enhanced use of ADR services;

4. A Division for mediation in the Judiciary and harmonized structures across JLOS institutions established.

project number1831-00/2013
source of fundingOEZA
sector Staatsführung & Zivilgesellschaft, allgemein
tied
modality
marker
  • Policy marker: are used to identify, assess and facilitate the monitoring of activities in support of policy objectives concerning gender equality, aid to environment, participatory development/good governance, trade development and reproductive, maternal, newborn and child health. Activities targeting the objectives of the Rio Conventions include the identification of biodiversity, climate change mitigation, climate change adaptation, and desertification.
    • 1= policy is a significant objective of the activity
    • 2= policy is the principal objective of the activity
  • Donor/ source of funding: The ADA is not only implementing projects and programmes of the Austrian Development Cooperation , but also projects funded from other sources and donors such as
    • AKF - Foreign Disaster Fund of the Austrian federal government
    • BMLFUW - Federal Ministry for Agriculture, Forestry, Environment and Water
    • EU - Funds of the European Commission
    • Others - various other donors are listed in ADA’s annual business report.
  • Type of Aid – Aid modalities: classifies transfers from the donor to the first recipient of funds such as budget support, core contributions and pooled programmes and funds to CSOs and multilateral organisations, project-type interventions, experts and other technical assistance, scholarships and student costs in donor countries, debt relief, administrative costs and other in-donor expenditures.
  • Purpose/ sector code: classifies the specific area of the recipient’s economic or social structure, funded by a bilateral contribution.
  • Tied/Untied: Untied aid is defined as loans and grants whose proceeds are fully and freely available to finance procurement from all OECD countries and substantially all developing countries. Transactions are considered tied unless the donor has, at the time of the aid offer, clearly specified a range of countries eligible for procurement which meets the tests for “untied” aid.