Support to JLOS Strategic Investment Plan II (Extension Phase)



Contract partner: MFPED - Ministry of Finance, Planning and Economic Development - UgandaCountry: Uganda Funding amount: € 1.700.000,00Project start: 01.07.2011End: 30.06.2012

Short Description:

Overall goal


Austria has supported Uganda’s Justice, Law and Order Sector (JLOS) since the early 1990s and uses a sector wide financing modality since 2002. It will continue funding JLOS in the financial year 2011/12 which contributes to reforming the sector (15 institutions, e.g. police, the judiciary, prisons, Human Rights Commission).


Investments in the sector are based on the Strategic Investment Plan (SIP) II (originally 2006/7–2010/11, now extended until 2011/12)., which draws from the National Development Plan.


The overall goal of JLOS as per SIP II is “to enhance quality of life and ensure that poverty in Uganda is eliminated”. The purpose is “to improve the safety of the person, security of property and access to justice, in order to encourage economic development and to benefit all people, especially the poor and vulnerable”. The SIP II has five key result areas:


1.'Rule of Law 2.'Human Rights 3.'Access to Justice 4.'Crime and safety 5.'Economic development


With the SIP II, the sector has also tried to place more focus on land, family, criminal and commercial justice reform.


Over the last years JLOS has implemented law reforms, strengthened institutions, improved infrastructure (especially in Northern Uganda), and decentralised services. During the extension period support e.g. for the family law reform will be continued so to achieve equal rights for men and women.


The additional funding for one more year also aims at building on the successes of the SIP II (e.g. further reduction in the average length of stay on remand, increasing welfare of prison inmates / police units with a human rights committee) and will for example further increase the presence of institutions of judiciary and law enforcement in underserved areas, especially in Northern Uganda.


In its monitoring role Austria places emphasis on gender issues, especially on women’s access to justice.

project number1831-01/2011
source of fundingOEZA
sector Staatsführung & Zivilgesellschaft, allgemein
tied
modality
marker
  • Policy marker: are used to identify, assess and facilitate the monitoring of activities in support of policy objectives concerning gender equality, aid to environment, participatory development/good governance, trade development and reproductive, maternal, newborn and child health. Activities targeting the objectives of the Rio Conventions include the identification of biodiversity, climate change mitigation, climate change adaptation, and desertification.
    • 1= policy is a significant objective of the activity
    • 2= policy is the principal objective of the activity
  • Donor/ source of funding: The ADA is not only implementing projects and programmes of the Austrian Development Cooperation , but also projects funded from other sources and donors such as
    • AKF - Foreign Disaster Fund of the Austrian federal government
    • BMLFUW - Federal Ministry for Agriculture, Forestry, Environment and Water
    • EU - Funds of the European Commission
    • Others - various other donors are listed in ADA’s annual business report.
  • Type of Aid – Aid modalities: classifies transfers from the donor to the first recipient of funds such as budget support, core contributions and pooled programmes and funds to CSOs and multilateral organisations, project-type interventions, experts and other technical assistance, scholarships and student costs in donor countries, debt relief, administrative costs and other in-donor expenditures.
  • Purpose/ sector code: classifies the specific area of the recipient’s economic or social structure, funded by a bilateral contribution.
  • Tied/Untied: Untied aid is defined as loans and grants whose proceeds are fully and freely available to finance procurement from all OECD countries and substantially all developing countries. Transactions are considered tied unless the donor has, at the time of the aid offer, clearly specified a range of countries eligible for procurement which meets the tests for “untied” aid.