Evaluierung des OEZA Engagements in Palästina



Contract partner: International Organisation Development (IOD PARC) Country: Palästinensische Gebiete Funding amount: € 116.712,00 Project start: 06.07.2022 End: 30.09.2023

Short Description:

Overall goal


The main purposes of this evaluation are learning and steering for better strategic decision making, programming and implementation. The evaluation will be formative and improvement oriented. This is the first strategic evaluation of ADC’s engagement in Palestine.

The main objectives of the evaluation are:

1. To assess the relevance and coherence of ADC’s engagement in Palestine and identify hindering and facilitating factors;

2. To assess the effectiveness, impact and sustainability of ADCs engagement in Palestine and identify good practice and challenges;

3. To assess facilitating and hindering factors for the sustainability of development results in general in Palestine;

4. To elaborate lessons learned in relation to relevance, coherence, effectiveness, impact and sustainability based on the findings and issue evidence-based, action-able recommendations for ADC’s future engagement in Palestine and, to the extent possible, in other fragile contexts.

 


Expected results


The evaluation will provide evidence for institutional and intra-institutional learning, including in relation to strategies, instruments, processes as well as resource needs. This will help understand ADCs role, impact and added value to date and help define its future engagement in Palestine.


Target group / Beneficiaries


The primary users of this evaluation are around 50 persons, more specifically, strategic decision makers, senior management and program staff across relevant departments at FMEIA and ADA (in Austria and in Palestine). It is expected that the evaluation will also be useful for other Austrian ODA actors and ADC partners active in Palestine.


Activities


The evaluation will employ a Mixed-Methods approach to data collection and data analysis, including both quantitative and qualitative methods. A Mixed-Methods design will be used to draw from the strengths of both qualitative and quantitative methods and to improve the internal validity of results through data and method triangulation. As such, the evaluation will use a range of data sources and data collection methods to ensure the reliability of results, promote impartiality, reduce bias, and ensure that the findings are based on the most comprehensive and relevant information possible.


Context


The Federal Ministry for European and International Affairs of Austria (FMEIA) started its bilateral development cooperation with Palestine in 1993 and opened a Representative Office (RO) in Ramallah in 1998 with Palestine being one of ADC’s priority countries since then. The RO Ramallah includes a sub-office in Gaza and covers the occupied Palestinian territory (oPt). It fulfills core foreign policy tasks including of economic, cultural and consular nature in addition to its responsibilities as Coordination Office of the Austrian Development Cooperation. The human resources of the Representative Office have varied over time and, as of March 2022, comprise five staff on the ground in Ramallah and Gaza.

The main task of Austrian Development Cooperation in Palestine is to assist Palestine on its way to a two-state solution by supporting the Palestinian Authority (PA) in building efficient, democratically legitimate and controlled institutions for a future sovereign democratic state. EU strategies and key documents form the basis for ADCs work and efforts in Palestine, with Austria participating in the EU’s Joint Programming since 2017 and no separate ADC strategy on Palestine in place. This puts ADC in Palestine in a unique position compared to its other focus countries for which ADC has developed its own strategies.

In terms of financial flows, between 2004 and 2020, Austrian ODA to Palestine totaled EUR 79.29 million, out of which 70.52 million by the Austrian Development Cooperation (FMEIA and ADA). For comparison, the total ODA from OECD DAC members to Palestine amounted to USD 33.6 billion between 2004 and 2019.

project number 2817-01/2021
source of funding OEZA
sector Staatsführung & Zivilgesellschaft, allgemein
tied
modality Other technical assistance
marker
  • Policy marker: are used to identify, assess and facilitate the monitoring of activities in support of policy objectives concerning gender equality, aid to environment, participatory development/good governance, trade development and reproductive, maternal, newborn and child health. Activities targeting the objectives of the Rio Conventions include the identification of biodiversity, climate change mitigation, climate change adaptation, and desertification.
    • 1= policy is a significant objective of the activity
    • 2= policy is the principal objective of the activity
  • Donor/ source of funding: The ADA is not only implementing projects and programmes of the Austrian Development Cooperation , but also projects funded from other sources and donors such as
    • AKF - Foreign Disaster Fund of the Austrian federal government
    • BMLFUW - Federal Ministry for Agriculture, Forestry, Environment and Water
    • EU - Funds of the European Commission
    • Others - various other donors are listed in ADA’s annual business report.
  • Type of Aid – Aid modalities: classifies transfers from the donor to the first recipient of funds such as budget support, core contributions and pooled programmes and funds to CSOs and multilateral organisations, project-type interventions, experts and other technical assistance, scholarships and student costs in donor countries, debt relief, administrative costs and other in-donor expenditures.
  • Purpose/ sector code: classifies the specific area of the recipient’s economic or social structure, funded by a bilateral contribution.
  • Tied/Untied: Untied aid is defined as loans and grants whose proceeds are fully and freely available to finance procurement from all OECD countries and substantially all developing countries. Transactions are considered tied unless the donor has, at the time of the aid offer, clearly specified a range of countries eligible for procurement which meets the tests for “untied” aid.