POLIO+-Aktion in Äthiopien - Österreichischer Beitrag für die Somali Region



Contract partner: WHO - World Health Organization (assessed contributions)Country: Äthiopien Funding amount: € 500.000,00Project start: 01.01.2006End: 31.12.2006

Short Description:

Overall goal


Ethiopia has conducted supplementary immunization activities since 1996, resulting in the successful interruption of wild poliovirus transmission in the country in January 2001. Following the confirmed re-importation of wild poliovirus in December 2004, Ethiopia implemented an outbreak response of five National Immunization Days in 2005 - each time aiming to reach all of the country's 15 million children under the age of five years - as well as two Sub-national Immunization Days targeting more than three million children living in the polio-affected areas. Since the confirmation of wild poliovirus in December 2004, surveillance activities have been intensified in all provinces of the country.


The financial contribution is to overcome the shortfall for the year 2006 polio eradication campaign and Surveillance in the Somali Region of Ethiopia in order to interrupt the final chains of the ongoing polio outbreak in this country . The core attention to the Somali Region is due to the fact that the health status of the Region is one of the lowest in the country. Low routine polio immunization coverage with three doses of OPV at 11% for 2005 in Somali Region makes interruption of the transmission of wild poliovirus a major challenge. It is expected that 53 Woredas of the Somali Region including bordering areas will participate in the polio vaccination campaign. The exercise will cover an estimated 900,000 children under the age of 5 years.

WHO has three surveillance officers supporting surveillance activities in Somali Region. Surveillance activities include the sensitization of all health workers, traditional healers and other key community informants regarding the importance of immediate reporting and investigation of all cases, active case searches including retrospective analysis of hospital documentations, as well as the inclusion of smaller health facilities into the active surveillance network.

project number2389-00/2005
source of fundingOEZA
sector Basisgesundheit
tied
modality
marker
  • Policy marker: are used to identify, assess and facilitate the monitoring of activities in support of policy objectives concerning gender equality, aid to environment, participatory development/good governance, trade development and reproductive, maternal, newborn and child health. Activities targeting the objectives of the Rio Conventions include the identification of biodiversity, climate change mitigation, climate change adaptation, and desertification.
    • 1= policy is a significant objective of the activity
    • 2= policy is the principal objective of the activity
  • Donor/ source of funding: The ADA is not only implementing projects and programmes of the Austrian Development Cooperation , but also projects funded from other sources and donors such as
    • AKF - Foreign Disaster Fund of the Austrian federal government
    • BMLFUW - Federal Ministry for Agriculture, Forestry, Environment and Water
    • EU - Funds of the European Commission
    • Others - various other donors are listed in ADA’s annual business report.
  • Type of Aid – Aid modalities: classifies transfers from the donor to the first recipient of funds such as budget support, core contributions and pooled programmes and funds to CSOs and multilateral organisations, project-type interventions, experts and other technical assistance, scholarships and student costs in donor countries, debt relief, administrative costs and other in-donor expenditures.
  • Purpose/ sector code: classifies the specific area of the recipient’s economic or social structure, funded by a bilateral contribution.
  • Tied/Untied: Untied aid is defined as loans and grants whose proceeds are fully and freely available to finance procurement from all OECD countries and substantially all developing countries. Transactions are considered tied unless the donor has, at the time of the aid offer, clearly specified a range of countries eligible for procurement which meets the tests for “untied” aid.