Livelihood Improvement through Sustainable Resource Management in North Gondar

Contract partner: Amhara BoFEC - Amhara National Regional State Bureau of Finance and Economic Cooperation Country: Äthiopien Funding amount: € 6.000.000,00 Project start: 01.05.2013 End: 31.12.2016

Short Description:

Overall goal

The overall objective is the improvement of livelihood opportunities and resilience of selected rural communities in North Gondar through sustainable resource management.

The first pillar 'Natural resource management' compromises e.g.

- Integrated Watershed Management

- Rural Land Administration

- Participatory Forest Management

- Support of National Park Infrastructure and Tourism Development

The second pillar 'Livelihood improvement' addresses food security e.g. through improved livestock and crop development and through value chain development.

The third pillar 'Program management and capacity building' gives emphasis to participatory planning and joint monitoring, linkages between research, extension and farmers (e.g. testing soil conservation structures, promotion of indigenous fodder trees), human resource development, knowledge management and gender mainstreaming. Expected exemplary results are:

- improved access to rehabilitated land

- 25000 households increased income by 30%

- Improved forest management

- 1900 households profited from off-farm activities

The program has been developed in accordance with the objectives of the national Growth and Transformation Plan. The poor rural population is the main beneficiary. The program management consists of steering committees at regional, zonal and district levels. The Project Coordination Unit provides overall coordination and backstopping. Funds are transferred to the Regional Bureau of Finance and Economic Development (BoFED). Besides BoFED major implementing partners are the Bureau of Agriculture, the Bureau of Environmental Protection, Land Administration and Use, the Amhara Regional Agricultural Research Institute, the Bureau of Culture, Tourism and Parks Development, the Ethiopian Wildlife Development and Conservation Authority and the Cooperatives Promotion Agency.

project number 2509-02/2013
source of funding OEZA
sector Landwirtschaft
  • Policy marker: are used to identify, assess and facilitate the monitoring of activities in support of policy objectives concerning gender equality, aid to environment, participatory development/good governance, trade development and reproductive, maternal, newborn and child health. Activities targeting the objectives of the Rio Conventions include the identification of biodiversity, climate change mitigation, climate change adaptation, and desertification.
    • 1= policy is a significant objective of the activity
    • 2= policy is the principal objective of the activity
  • Donor/ source of funding: The ADA is not only implementing projects and programmes of the Austrian Development Cooperation , but also projects funded from other sources and donors such as
    • AKF - Foreign Disaster Fund of the Austrian federal government
    • BMLFUW - Federal Ministry for Agriculture, Forestry, Environment and Water
    • EU - Funds of the European Commission
    • Others - various other donors are listed in ADA’s annual business report.
  • Type of Aid – Aid modalities: classifies transfers from the donor to the first recipient of funds such as budget support, core contributions and pooled programmes and funds to CSOs and multilateral organisations, project-type interventions, experts and other technical assistance, scholarships and student costs in donor countries, debt relief, administrative costs and other in-donor expenditures.
  • Purpose/ sector code: classifies the specific area of the recipient’s economic or social structure, funded by a bilateral contribution.
  • Tied/Untied: Untied aid is defined as loans and grants whose proceeds are fully and freely available to finance procurement from all OECD countries and substantially all developing countries. Transactions are considered tied unless the donor has, at the time of the aid offer, clearly specified a range of countries eligible for procurement which meets the tests for “untied” aid.